Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0274 14
Original file (NR0274 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2480

 

BC
Docket No: 00274-14

11 July 2014

 

 

This-is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United
States Code, section 1552. ce

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 July 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. .

You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active
duty on 24 March 2008. On 31 August 2011, you received
nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for drunken or reckless operation
of a vehicle. On 14 November 2011, you received counseling and
were informed that you would receive a waivable RE-3P (failure
to meet physical/medical standards) reentry code for failure to
meet height and weight standards. You were released from active
duty, received an honorable characterization of service on 23
March 2012, and were assigned an RE-3P reentry code.

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors present in
your case, however, the Board found those factors insufficient
to warrant any change in your reentry code in light of your
failure to meet height and weight standards. The Board found
you were fortunate to receive an honorable discharge with
misconduct in your record. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
_.the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
-a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
;existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

ROBERT D., ALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3590-13

    Original file (NR3590-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2014. On 3 June 1994, you received a general characterization of service due to weight control failure, and were assigned 3 an RE- 3P (weight control failure) reentry code. | Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2723 14

    Original file (NR2723 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, Marines discharged by reason of a medical condition normally are assigned an RE-3P reentry code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0257 14

    Original file (NR0257 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5642 13

    Original file (NR5642 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ({onsequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07033-00

    Original file (07033-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Additionally, an individual cannot be promoted if he is not within the Marine Corps height and weight standards. P1400.32B, Marine Corps Promotion Manual, Volume 2, Enlisted Promotions, provides that Marines assigned RE-3P...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2431-13

    Original file (NR2431-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9579 14

    Original file (NR9579 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. At that time you were assigned an RE-3P reentry code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01550-09

    Original file (01550-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN ' Docket No: 1550-09 17 November 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the. Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01089-08

    Original file (01089-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8639 13

    Original file (NR8639 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.